Smirking Chimps Undermines War on Terror (TM)

When the AP runs a story like this, what else needs to be said?

WASHINGTON – While the British terror suspects were hatching their plot, the Bush administration was quietly seeking permission to divert $6 million that was supposed to be spent this year developing new homeland explosives detection technology. Congressional leaders rejected the idea, the latest in a series of steps by the Homeland Security Department that has left lawmakers and some of the department’s own experts questioning the commitment to create better anti-terror technologies.

2 Responses to Smirking Chimps Undermines War on Terror (TM)

  1. Primavera says:

    True, these letters to the editor @ the NyTimes say it all:

    To the Editor:

    Re “Terror Plot Foiled; Airports Quickly Clamp Down” (front page, Aug. 11):

    The actions of the British in stopping this bomb plot were classic examples of good international police work. President Bush touted this as part of the “war on terror,” but it apparently did not involve any army, navy or air force.

    No bombs were dropped. No country was invaded. No one was killed, and nothing was destroyed.

    It was effective, and it did not enrage millions as the invasion of Iraq has done. It was a police action, not an act of war.

    The “war on terror” is not a war. President Bush calls it a war so that he can be a wartime president and claim to be a heroic protector of America, but this is bogus.

    Terrorism cannot be fought with armies. They make things only worse. Mr. President, bring the armies home and concentrate on good police work.

    John Hilberry
    New York, Aug. 11, 2006

    To the Editor:

    One of the Bush administration’s many justifications of the fiasco in Iraq is that “we are fighting the terrorists there so that we don’t have to fight them at home.” So thousands of lives are lost and billions of dollars are wasted in Iraq, which is dissolving into civil war.

    Meanwhile, the real threats to our interests are apparently being nurtured in Western cities like London, with the help of Al Qaeda in Pakistan.

    How much more effective might the “war on terrorism” have been if we had concentrated on defeating Al Qaeda in Afghanistan rather than allowing its forces to become entrenched in Pakistan; and using the billions of dollars expended in Iraq on truly effective homeland security measures, which we can’t afford because of the war in Iraq?

    Judith Pulley
    Chapel Hill, N.C., Aug. 11, 2006

    To the Editor:

    President Bush said on Thursday: “It is a mistake to believe there is no threat to the United States of America. We’ve taken a lot of measures to protect the American people. But obviously we still aren’t completely safe.”

    Every American should demand to know what measures Mr. Bush has taken. Why are our ports, railways, airports, borders and nuclear power plants still vulnerable?

    Most important, why, after three years, has terrorism spread like a cancer out of control around the world? What has Mr. Bush done to unite the world against the terrorist threat? If national security is an issue this fall, Mr. Bush and the Republicans have failed.

    Pam Walton
    Mountain View, Calif., Aug. 11, 2006

    To the Editor:

    Re “The London Plot” (editorial, Aug. 11):

    Sooner or later people will figure out that talking tough on terrorism is not the same as resolving the issue.

    The Bush-Cheney-Rove marketing machine has, thus far, successfully used fear to win votes. It’s not surprising that Senator Joseph I. Lieberman has adopted this tactic.

    We’ll find out in November if this tired, craven propaganda still works. Recent national polling shows that the American people may have had enough.

    Most Americans know there’s not always truth in advertising.

    Nancy Linden
    McLean, Va., Aug. 11, 2006

  2. wm l gilbert clock

    SomegifttoME 613383 wm l gilbert clock co

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: